The Circuit logo
Mission Statement

A data-driven collaboration to investigate and reveal how Cook County’s courts work.

The Circuit is an unparalleled collaborative journalism investigation that explores and exposes decades of overlooked data and their connecting patterns buried in the files of the Cook County courts.

The project is led by two nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism organizations— the Better Government Association and Injustice Watch —in partnership with civic tech consultants DataMade. The organizations are working together to gather, organize and analyze more than 30 years of data from every division of the Cook County Circuit Court system. We aim to expose how different defendants charged with similar crimes are treated, dissect trends in how prosecutors have charged people and study how well defendants have been represented by counsel. We will scrutinize systemic inequities and reveal biases in the fabric of the legal system that have been suspected for generations but never definitively proven.

The Cook County Circuit Court is the second largest unified court system in the world and has long served as a national indicator on issues of justice and equity. The Circuit project also comes at a time when issues of justice and fairness are taking center stage in the national discourse following years of criticism about biased treatment from law enforcement and the judicial system. Gaining access and analyzing millions of records would have been impossible without this unprecedented collaboration in which news organizations, civic tech experts and researchers combined their distinctive expertises and missions to achieve a collective goal.

This work hasn’t been easy. Much of the data we extracted from the court system was complicated and disorganized, but we were able to arrange it in a usable way to answer long-standing questions about a court system that serves 5.2 million residents.

At a time when the local media is shrinking across the nation, including in Chicago and Cook County, we hope our collaboration serves as a statement that despite our organizations’ varied missions, we share similar core values and goals to achieve a greater good: exposing institutional failures that obstruct justice, confronting racial and economic inequity, and providing greater transparency to make the court system more accountable.

Who We Are

In addition to the BGA, Injustice Watch and DataMade, additional partners on the project have included the Center for Survey Methodology at the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy; the Chicago Data Collaborative; the Chicago Reader and the Chicago Reporter. This work was funded through a grant from the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.

Reporters: Jared Rutecki, Casey Toner, Emily Hoerner, Josh McGhee, Abby Blachman, Alejandro Fernández Sanabria

Data Analysis: Jean Cochrane, Hannah Cushman, Forest Gregg, Bea Malsky, Jasmine Mithani, Seiya Kawashima, Trina Reynolds-Tyler, Lea Washington, David Eads

Engagement: Charles Preston, Olivia Obineme, Alexia Diamond, Starlyn Matheny, Mia Sato, Toni Shears, Asraa Mustafa

Designer: Chris Courtney

Illustrator: Verónica Martínez

Translators: Gisela Orozco, Jorge Mederos

Editors: John Chase, David Kidwell, Adeshina Emmanuel, Jonah Newman, Rick Tulsky, Matt O’Connor, Fernando Diaz, Matt Kiefer

Development/Project Coordinators: Kate Walsh, Amanda Miley

How We Did This Work

The data for The Circuit was gathered through terminal access to the Cook County Circuit Court’s mainframe information system.

Until 2019, electronic records of court cases were recorded into a mainframe information system. Members of the public and journalists could access this system through public, text-based terminals located in Cook County courthouses. In summer 2018, Injustice Watch requested and was granted remote access to the mainframe system.

Using software that emulated a mainframe terminal, Injustice Watch could access much of the same information available through the public terminals — but from a personal computer.

Injustice Watch hired the Chicago civic technology company DataMade to write a computer program to automatically access and record the case dockets and case management information for criminal cases. A case docket is a record of the motions, rulings and similar events in a case. The case management information includes details about the defendant, arresting agency and status of the case.

The program ran between April and August 2019 at nights and weekends to ensure that this work did not interfere with other members of the public who were looking up cases. This initial extract was paid for by the Chicago Data Collaborative and Injustice Watch.

After we secured this initial data, we formed The Circuit collaborative in 2019. It consisted of Injustice Watch, the BGA, DataMade, the Chicago Reporter and the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy. The collaborative received additional funds to organize and standardize the data and to write similar extraction programs for the other divisions of the court.

For each criminal case, DataMade’s program produced two files of text — one for the case docket and the second for case management information. DataMade wrote additional programs to extract the information from those text files into tables of data. These tables were loaded into PostgreSQL, an open source, relational database in which journalists could query the data.

Once in an organized format, journalists from the BGA, the Chicago Reporter, and Injustice Watch, DataMade staff and students from the Harris School of Public Policy documented what the data meant and how to use it.

The data contained problems that needed to be fixed. Information about charges was not standardized; events in the court dockets were not always recorded in the correct order; motions and rulings were sometimes missing; and typos were common. Among the biggest problems was that the race, ethnicity and gender information of defendants was often missing or inaccurate. We resolved that by matching the court data with other county data that more accurately recorded that information. But additional work cleaning the data remains.